Compared to them, the Vikings were crude, brutish and bordering on the dense. Their stories are much richer in classic lore, mystique, wealth of characters and any other critique that may tickle your fancy. If I were to indulge in playing games with White spooks, why, I would choose the Greek or the Roman gods ten to one over the Viking's. Big deal! If we must deal in hokum at all, why not pick a higher grade of hocus-pocus, when the White Race has such an excellent selection to choose from? The Vikings were neither the first nor the best in that category. We now come to the Odinist admission that, well yeah, we admit all this Norse mythology is hocus-pocus, but at least it is White, not Jewish hocus-pocus. The High God remains aloof because of his presence everywhere, and he also remains aloof because of his immediate presence in the lowest of matter. The High God cannot be named, for to do so would denigrate him to lower status by means of limitation and mislabeling. The High God is the cosmic force, the stuff which glues the universe together the medium of all sympathetic and intellectual communication, the buffer between the antagonistic forces and rivalries. The High God is spoken of as though the Aesir Gods are much inferior to it. Odinism allows us to speak of God in very general terms also in fact, the High God is still unknown. Thus Odinism becomes an affirmation of the continuity and stability of existence, however you wish to explain it. Odin was, among other things, God of the dead, especially warriors. In any case, Odinism has this edge over non-religion: It allows for after-life, continuous life, or reincarnation, or combination of the two.
Thoroughgoing eclectic theology which can better ground our ideas in an eternal constancy, and consistency. Here are a few vital questions to which I would like to have a few reasonable answers. Hand claims he desires to see happen - wrest the destiny of the White Race from the hands of the Jews and into the capable hands of the White Race itself. It is a religion of this era, not a moldy relic from the past. In the last paragraph he comes to the conclusion that "if we had in America 'Odinists' instead of Identity Christians we would stand a much better chance of wresting our destiny from the hands of the Jews." With this, too, I do not disagree, but he seems to completely ignore a racial religious movement, CREATIVITY, that is well known to the readers of "Liberty Bell," a religious movement that is solely dedicated to the survival, expansion, and advancement of the White Race. Hand says, it is what he doesn't say that is somewhat disturbing. Hand, Odinist, which appeared in the May issue of "Liberty Bell." Whereas I have little criticism of what Mr. This letter is in response to that of Ronald S.